- Status
- Offline
- Joined
- Mar 3, 2026
- Messages
- 60
- Reaction score
- 7
Just dropping the source here, too lazy to test it myself.
Been seeing a lot of debate on the boards lately about whether the aimbot life is actually worth it or if keeping it simple with a triggerbot is the move. OP over on another board is claiming they survived radiant lobbies for a year using a triggerbot instead of an aimbot.
Honestly, aimbot always feels risky unless you are running a proper DMA setup with a 2nd PC and a fuser. If you are just doing pixel-based stuff, you are basically asking for a HWID ban the moment you start tracking too smoothly. Triggerbots are usually easier to mask as normal input lag or human reaction time, so it makes sense why it feels more reliable.
Anyone else actually running a triggerbot in high elo, or is it just another "I'm not cheating" cope?
Been seeing a lot of debate on the boards lately about whether the aimbot life is actually worth it or if keeping it simple with a triggerbot is the move. OP over on another board is claiming they survived radiant lobbies for a year using a triggerbot instead of an aimbot.
- Triggerbot vs Aimbot: OP thinks aimbot feels janky whether it is color or AI-based, while triggerbot feels more consistent for actual legit play.
- Legit Playstyle: Using triggerbot as a replacement for the fire key rather than holding pixel angles.
- Safety/Bans: Claiming to have dodged VAL PD and Vanguard for a year straight.
Honestly, aimbot always feels risky unless you are running a proper DMA setup with a 2nd PC and a fuser. If you are just doing pixel-based stuff, you are basically asking for a HWID ban the moment you start tracking too smoothly. Triggerbots are usually easier to mask as normal input lag or human reaction time, so it makes sense why it feels more reliable.
Anyone else actually running a triggerbot in high elo, or is it just another "I'm not cheating" cope?
