- Status
- Offline
- Joined
- Mar 3, 2026
- Messages
- 692
- Reaction score
- 457
FiveM's internal handling of natives has been a recurring headache, especially when dealing with specific builds like 3258. There's a persistent issue trying to hook GET_ENTITY_PLAYER_IS_FREE_AIMING_AT (hash
Testing with a standard Native Invoker works for other functions, but this specific hash is returning nothing or failing to resolve. Even using build-specific hashes for 3258 isn't yielding results. This usually points to FiveM either remapping the handler in a way the crossmap doesn't catch or the native being virtualized/protected differently in recent iterations.
Technical Breakdown of the Issue:
If the hash isn't working even with a functional invoker, we might be looking at a manual search through the handler table or a signature scan for the specific function logic rather than relying on the hash translation. It's possible the native was refactored or shadowed behind a different internal call.
Anyone managed to dump the handler table for 3258 and verify if this hash is still valid?
0x2975C866E6713290). Despite using the standard crossmap and referencing the GTA release dump, the native seems completely MIA or heavily obfuscated.Testing with a standard Native Invoker works for other functions, but this specific hash is returning nothing or failing to resolve. Even using build-specific hashes for 3258 isn't yielding results. This usually points to FiveM either remapping the handler in a way the crossmap doesn't catch or the native being virtualized/protected differently in recent iterations.
Technical Breakdown of the Issue:
- Native Hash: 0x2975C866E6713290
- Environment: FiveM Build 3258
- Method: Native Invoker / Crossmap Mapping
- Status: Fails to find or hook, while other natives remain functional.
- Verified native invoker logic — other calls are successful.
- Cross-referenced with FiveM's own internal crossmaps for build 3258.
- Attempted to locate the handler via GTA release dumps.
If the hash isn't working even with a functional invoker, we might be looking at a manual search through the handler table or a signature scan for the specific function logic rather than relying on the hash translation. It's possible the native was refactored or shadowed behind a different internal call.
Anyone managed to dump the handler table for 3258 and verify if this hash is still valid?